OUR LATEST ARTICLES Merlin's Library Filter by Category > Subscribe Regulatory Compliance Jul 7, 2026 Analysts expect rising PPA prices as clean energy tax credits phase out > Read With the July 4 safe-harbor deadline passed, non-tax-advantaged solar projects may need PPAs in the mid-to-high $60s/MWh, up from $40-45. Jul 3, 2026 FERC issues ‘show cause’ orders to US grid operators on large load integration. > Read FERC gives PJM, MISO, SPP, CAISO, ISO-NE, and NYISO 60 days to show their tariffs can handle data center-scale loads without shifting costs to ratepayers. Jun 25, 2026 Battery Storage Incentive Landscape in New York > Read The Big Apple needs Big Batteries, too! Jun 2, 2026 Garden State Energy Storage Program (GSEP) > Read Regulatory Compliance May 27, 2026 ERCOT NPRR 1333: Is Your Inverter-Based Resource Eligible for the $25M Grid-Forming Incentive? > Read Regulatory Compliance May 6, 2026 Field Failures > Read Series of graphical lessons learned from field Quality Assurance (QA) of solar and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) projects Energy Markets May 4, 2026 Midcontinent Independent System Operator [MISO] > Read Energy Markets Apr 27, 2026 Round-Trip Efficiency Is Not a Spec Sheet Number - It's a System Behavior Under Load > Read Why BESS efficiency claims without operating context are meaningless, and what actually drives the 15–20 point gap between lab specs and field performance Regulatory Compliance Apr 20, 2026 The Container Problem in LFP Long-Duration Storage > Read Why bigger cells don't mean proportionally more energy in a 20-foot box Energy Markets Mar 27, 2026 From lab to grid: making LDES bankable > Read The chemistry debates hide the real issues: Commercial readiness, technological advancement, operational flexibility, and market adaptation Regulatory Compliance Feb 10, 2026 Foreign Entity of Concern (FEOC) Regulations for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) > Read Based on Notice 2026-15 Energy Markets Feb 4, 2026 Tired of BESS commissioning delays? Start the process earlier than you think > Read Regulatory Compliance Feb 2, 2026 PJMInterconnectivity > Read Summary of Base Residual Auction (BRA) 2027/2028 Energy Markets Dec 4, 2025 CAISO Market Operations > Read Understanding IFM, FMM and RTD in California's Energy Market Energy Markets Dec 2, 2025 SMART 3.0 - PY 26 Update > Read What's New in MA's Solar and Storage Framework Energy Markets Nov 11, 2025 ERCOT RTC + B > Read A Market Overhaul in Progress Energy Markets Nov 6, 2025 The Future of Grid - Scale Storage > Read How Technology, Market Shifts, and Design Are Redefining Energy Storage Regulatory Compliance Oct 30, 2025 NFPA 855 (2026) > Read Camelot Takes on Evolving ESS Safety Standards Energy Markets Oct 28, 2025 Smart 3.0 Is Here > Read Here's What You Need to Know Construction Aug 26, 2025 Constructability Part 2 > Read From Concept to Construction – Getting Solar Project Layout and Access Right Regulatory Compliance Aug 8, 2025 Camelot Unpacks UL 9540 – Part 2 > Read Regulatory Compliance Aug 8, 2025 Camelot Unpacks UL 9540 – Part 1 > Read Regulatory Compliance Apr 4, 2025 New U.S. Tariff Policy > Read Implications for Energy and Manufacturing Energy Markets Mar 20, 2025 New Acquisition Opportunity in MISO > Read M&A Opportunity Mar 14, 2025 New Acquisition Opportunity in ISO-NE > Read Construction Mar 10, 2025 Constructability Part 1 > Read The Critical Role of Constructability in Renewable Energy Projects Regulatory Compliance Feb 13, 2025 NERC’s New Compliance Threshold > Read What You Need to Know About the 20MW+ Requirements Energy Markets Feb 12, 2025 MA SMART Part 2 > Read Key Financial Implications for Hybrid Systems Energy Markets Jan 15, 2025 MA SMART Part 1 > Read Massachusetts SMART and Clean Peak Overview M&A Opportunity Jan 14, 2025 New Acquisition Opportunity in ERCOT > Read Energy Markets Nov 7, 2024 Part 2: VDER Revenue Stack > Read VDER Revenue Stack for Hybrid (Solar + Storage) Projects Energy Markets Oct 31, 2024 U.S. ISO/RTO Regions > Read Exploring Market Opportunities Across U.S. ISO/RTO Regions Energy Markets Oct 10, 2024 Part 1: VDER Revenue Stack > Read VDER Revenue Stack for Standalone Storage Projects Solar Availability Sep 11, 2024 Solar Availability Series Part 4 > Read Camelot’s Balanced Approach Solar Availability Aug 30, 2024 Solar Availability Series Part 3 > Read Methods for Maximization Solar Availability Aug 23, 2024 Solar Availability Series Part 2 > Read Measurements and Metrics Solar Availability Aug 15, 2024 Solar Availability Series Part 1 > Read Background and State-of-the-Industry Energy Markets Jan 30, 2024 On VDER > Read Simplifying the (Somewhat) Simplified Economics of DG Projects in New York State Subscribe Stay informed Email* Subscribe I want to receive alerts for new articles

WHO WE ARE At Camelot, we believe in and work towards a just, equitable, and sustainable society where everyone has access to clean and affordable electricity. Getting to this point will require substantial investment in solar, energy storage, and other clean energy technologies, with such investment coming not only from banks and investment funds but communities, corporations, and governments. > Read More RT Our Round Table Shawn Shaw, PE Founder, CEO Read More Aaron King, PE Director of Programs & Policy Read More Hieu Le Chief Financial Officer Read More Jacques Cantin, PE Senior Project Manager Read More Sagar Bharadwaj, PMP Project Manager Read More Lynn Appollis-Laurent, PE Director, Technical Services Read More Raafe Khan Head of Energy Storage and Emerging Markets Read More Bill Atkinson, CEM Senior Project Engineer Read More Andrew Leslie Senior Project Engineer Read More Nimisha Shah Associate Analyst Read More Taylor Parsons Director, Technical Advisory Read More Bill Coon, NABCEP PVIP Head of Construction Read More Mark Warner Senior Project Manager Read More Michelle Aguirre, NABCEP PVIP Project Manager Read More Calla Schultz Associate Project Engineer Read More

Resources Camelot has put together a range of free resources to help your community navigate large-scale solar and battery energy storage projects, from live office hours and fact sheets to in-depth guides and toolkits. Explore what's below, and don't hesitate to reach out with questions. Office Hours Have questions about a solar or battery storage project in your community? Camelot is hosting free, drop-in office hours for public agency staff, municipal officials, and community members. Join us every other Thursday, 3:00–4:00 PM ET, from September 17th to November 12th, 2026. Register here BESS Fact Sheets Through our work with the Interstate Renewable Energy Council, we've fielded hundreds of questions from local officials and community members about battery energy storage systems (BESS). We've distilled the most common ones into two free, two-page fact sheets: Download: BESS Safety & Technology Download: Community Benefits of BESS Codes Guidebook Camelot's Founder and CEO, Shawn Shaw, PE, has just published the second edition of Energy Storage Systems Based on the IBC®, IFC®, IRC® and NEC®, Second Edition - a practical guide to help public planners, building officials, engineers, and inspectors navigate the rapidly evolving world of ESS. Order your copy Large Scale Solar & Battery Toolkit Camelot partnered with the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC) to develop the Large-Scale Solar and Battery Storage Toolkit - a resource offering best practices for large-scale solar, covering public engagement, planning, permitting, and more. Access the toolkit Questions? Check out our Clean Energy Helpdesk where you can submit questions, and one of us on the team will reach out. Otherwise, feel free to submit a form on our Contact page. Clean Energy Helpdesk Contact Us

Apr 4, 2025 New U.S. Tariff Policy In an Executive Order signed on April 2, 2025, President Trump has instituted a minimum 10% universal tariff on all imports starting April 5. These 10% tariffs will be additional to “Reciprocal Tariffs” between 10% and 50% on products from about 60 countries starting April 9. The Trump Administration has calculated these Reciprocal Tariffs based on the ratio of country-level trade deficits with the US divided by the value of US imports from the target country. This ratio is being described as a measure of perceived unbalanced trade practices against the US and the Reciprocal Tariffs are being set at 50% of this value for most countries. We note that there are a variety of reasons for countries to have trade deficits and the existence of such deficits is not, in its own, an indication of unfair or unfavorable trade policies. It merely conveys that the US buys more of a country’s exports than that country buys of US exports and these deficits are a normal part of global trade between nations. Exceptions ➡️These new tariffs will not apply to goods that have been loaded on a vessel at a port and are deemed to be in transit before the new rates go into effect. ➡️The universal rate will not apply to goods in transit to the US before April 5 and the reciprocal rates will not apply to goods in transit to the US before April 9. ➡️According to the Executive Order, the new tariffs will not apply to certain articles that President Trump has already singled out for current or possible future sector-specific tariffs. Per the National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA), these sectors are steel, aluminum, some downstream products that use steel or aluminum, copper, pharmaceuticals, autos and auto parts, semiconductors, certain critical minerals and energy and energy products. ➡️The tariffs apply only to the non-US content of goods that include US components. However, at least 20% of the value of such goods would have to originate within the US. Implications for the Energy Sector The new tariffs will impact a variety of energy related technologies, from solar modules produced in Vietnam to wind turbines made with foreign components. FERC recently released their Energy Infrastructure Update for January 2025, in which they noted that the vast majority of new generating capacity will be in solar and wind . Other equipment necessary for bringing power plants online, like switchgear, transformers, and substation equipment is largely imported and will see costs increase. The fossil fuel industry is not exempt, either. Thermal generation equipment, like natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) turbines. Supply is already constrained, and capacity is tied up until about 2029-2031 from Tier 1 suppliers, so added costs will add even more strain. The broad application of new tariffs is expected to have an impact across the energy sector, from gas turbines to solar modules, just as energy demand is growing nationwide to fuel the growth of the AI sector. Impacts on the Energy Storage Supply Chain Many of the countries that supply battery energy storage systems (BESS) to the US market are heavily impacted by the new tariffs. As it currently stands, assuming no other changes, by January 2026, BESS from China will be subject to a total tariff of about 82.4%, as shown below. Clearly, juggling all of the relevant tariffs and duties is a significant exercise with many moving parts. *HTSUS = The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Tariff Rate Base Tariff, applied March 2025 20.0% HTSUS* Tariff (2012) 3.4.0% Section 301 Tariff 7.5% (2025), 25.0% (2026) Reciprocal Tariff 34.0% Total 64.9% (2025), 82.4% (2026) A summary of the major BESS exporting countries to the US and their new tariffs is shown below. Imported BESS from China have a significantly higher expected tariff than most other countries exporting BESS into the US market. The final tariffs on any product, however, will be complicated to determine as the underlying components may, themselves, be subject to additional tariffs (e.g., an Indonesian BESS made with Chinese inputs). This will be most impactful to the lithium iron phosphate (LFP) BESS suppliers in the near term but with no country being exempt from at least some sort of tariff, we can expect a great deal of supply chain adjustment in the months ahead. Country HTSUS Tariff Base Tariff Section 301 Tariff (Before 1/1/26) Section 301 Tariff (After 1/1/26) US Reciprocal Tariff Total New Tarriff Rate in 2025 Total New Tariff Rate in 2026 China 3.4% 20.0% 7.5% 25.0% 34.0% 64.9% 82.4% Indonesia 3.4% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 32.0% 45.4% 45.4% South Korea 3.4% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 38.4% 38.4% Japan 3.4% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 24.0% 37.4% 37.4% Impacts on Battery Storage Pricing Based on our tariff tracker, Chinese made DC blocks are now effectively between the $130 - $180 per kWh-dc range (DDP to site), whereas Non-Chinese DC blocks (manufactured in let’s say Indonesia) are between the $115 - $165 per kWh-dc range (DDP to site). Baseline costs are expected to shift in the near term so this gap may narrow or widen further based on macroeconomic conditions. The gap between domestically manufactured non-LFP DC blocks and Chinese made LFP blocks is expected to narrow by early next year to about $50-$60 per kWh-dc. This means, if OEMs in this category reduce their prices by about 25-30%, based on current capacity projects, then, domestically manufactured non-LFP BESS will be a more attractive option for buyers based on total cost of ownership, not inclusive of the domestic content adder under the IRA. It is to be noted that the American Active Anode Material Producers (AAAMP) filed an AD/CVD petition in 2024 seeking a tariff of up to 910%. This has not yet been adjudicated by the Department of Commerce; however, we expect some movement on this later this fiscal year. Chart from Camelot Energy Group – Impact of April 5 Tariff on DC Blocks International Reactions The scale of the current trade actions is highly likely to elicit stiff responses from the international community. As of this morning of 4/4/25, China has announced a 34% tariff on all US imports, alongside increased export controls affecting rare earth minerals and other key materials exported to the US. While the US is a net importer of most clean energy technologies, US exports of biofuels and components for wind and hydropower systems may be impacted. Perhaps even more impactful, however, would be an increase in export controls that reduce the availability of key input materials. Efforts to onshore lithium-ion battery production, for example, will struggle without a ready supply of high grade graphite for making suitable anodes (currently, despite recent AD/CVD claims, there are no domestic suppliers of graphite who can meet the battery industry’s purity requirements). Also, the majority of equipment used in manufacturing solar cells is currently sold by China, with one recent manufacturer Camelot spoke with indicating the only other option was to buy European equipment at “4x the cost and half the output” compared to the Chinese alternatives. If these trade actions are intended to spur a renaissance of domestic manufacturing, the US is highly vulnerable to interrupted supply chains and export controls from abroad that restrict the very tools we need to build and scale a domestic manufacturing industry. The global trade situation and its impacts on the clean energy sector are evolving quickly and this is a developing topic. Stay tuned for periodic updates from the Camelot team in the days ahead. Follow us on LinkedIn for the latest insights. Next Steps for Industry Stakeholders With growing pressure due to pricing, it is time to carefully evaluate projects and supply chain risks. The Camelot team can help asset owners, investors, and other key stakeholders: Perform due diligence on potential new projects, optimizing technology, revenue streams, and asset management strategy Establish, strengthen, and diversify supply chains to ensure you have flexibility to keep your projects on track Evaluate new technologies that may offer new opportunities, as well as new challenges The Camelot team combines technical, economic, procurement, and strategic insights to help our clients navigate the changing market. Reach out to Hello@CamelotEnergyGroup.com today. We look forward to hearing how the new tariffs affect your business- and ensuring you get the help you need. Bespoke technical and strategic advisory for a better world Raafe Khan, Shawn Shaw < Back Back

Dec 2, 2025 SMART 3.0 - PY 26 Update The Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources (MA DOER) released their final form for the 2026 Program Year. Here’s what you need to know: The DOER began accepting SMART 3.0 applications on October 15, 2025, and since then, 191.90 MW has been submitted, with 301 applications > 25 kW and 86 applications < 25 kW Based on several factors, from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) of 2025, to equipment supply chain issues, and projected load growth, the DOER revised the following elements of the draft report: PY26 Base Compensation Rates PY26 Energy Storage Multiplier PY26 Annual Capacity Block PY26 Capacity Allocations and Set Asides Capacity Block: PY2026 will have a 600 MW AC of available capacity for STGU subject to the annual cap. This is an increase from the 450 MW AC capacity in the initial draft. Per 225 CMR 28.05 (4), each EDC will be allocated at least 5% of the available capacity block and the remaining capacity will be allocated to the total retail electric load served to Massachusetts customers by each EDC. The distribution capacity for PY2026 was based on March 2026 retail electric load of each EDC. The allocations shall be as follows: Source: Camelot Energy Group 225 CMR 28.05 (5), a minimum amount of capacity is set aside for the following categories: Standalone STGUs > 25 kW and ≤ 250 kW STGUs > 250 and ≤ 500 kW Low Income Property STGUs And Community Shared Solar STGUs These set asides are allocated accordingly: Source: Camelot Energy Group Base Compensation Rates: Base Compensation Rates for STGUs > 25 kW AC were based on the levelized revenue requirements for each project based on the following inputs: Capacity factor Production degradation Installation costs Financing costs Operation and maintenance costs Project management costs Land lease costs Incremental operating and capital expense costs Based on public feedback, and an attempt to balance analysis results with the desire to avoid a significant shift in the MA solar market in the first full year of SMART 3.0 Base Compensation Rates were revised as follows: PY2026 Adders The Compensation Rate Adders for STGUs >25 kW AC were developed by comparing the average levelized cost of energy of all project types >25 kW AC for each respective adder category to a baseline value. Based on the Program Year 2026 analysis, DOER found that there was variation in whether Compensation Rate Adders for Program Year 2026 should be reduced, kept the same, or increased (see “Calculated PY26 Adder Rate” below). As with the Base Compensation Rates, based on the overall Annual SMART Program Assessment, DOER decided to maintain or increase the value of Compensation Rate Adders (see “PY26 Adder Rate” below). That said, the Compensation Rate Adders for PY2026 will be as follows: In conclusion, it is clear that federal policy and broad-based challenges in the energy value chain prompted some changes. We find that rates have mostly increased or stayed the same relative to the initial draft proposal. We see that the DOER is sending a price signal that energy storage and solar are going to be key tools in achieving state mandated energy affordability and climate-based goals. One thing is clear; Massachusetts is setting a strong example of how to fairly incentivize public and private investment in energy infrastructure with the goal of making energy affordable across customer archetypes in the Commonwealth. Raafe Khan < Back Back

Jul 7, 2026 Analysts expect rising PPA prices as clean energy tax credits phase out Dive Brief: Ahead of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s July 4 deadline for wind and solar projects to commence construction in order to capitalize on the Inflation Reduction Act’s investment and production tax credits, developers have met the occasion and safe-harbored a massive pipeline of projects, industry experts say. Crux, which provides a marketplace for the transfer of tax credits, in February estimated a 170 gigawatt pipeline of safe harbored projects. “So it’s presumably only grown over the past seven months,” Josh Price, Crux’s director of intelligence and research, told ESG Dive sister publication Utility Dive. Price, along with Camelot Energy Group Head of Energy Storage and Emerging Markets Raafe Khan, predicted that as projects are no longer eligible to qualify for IRA tax credits, the price of power purchase agreements for those projects is likely to go up. Dive Insight: “If you don’t have the ITC, you have to make that up with revenue and cost,” Khan told Utility Dive. “There’s not so much that a developer can do on cost as much as they can do to negotiate a PPA rate that is favorable, but that does push forward-looking power pricing to the higher end.” Khan said that Camelot Energy Group analyzed the difference between a tax-advantaged and a non-tax-advantaged solar asset, and found that the example case of a 200 megawatt solar facility with a 30% investment tax credit would need a PPA “in the $40 to $45 per megawatt hour range. But if you’re non-tax advantaged, no ITC basis, then you’re basically pushing mid-to-high $60s.” “That’s a 50% increase in power price alone, and that’s going to put a lot of pressure on utilities and developers,” he said. Price said that in the absence of tax credits, “that missing money has to come from somewhere to make the project pencil, and that will likely be through PPA prices, so really it’s kind of a shift from the taxpayer to the ratepayer to make up that delta.” In the meantime, however, Khan said “a healthy amount of projects” that are tax-advantaged will complete construction and be placed in service between 2028 and 2030. “I do think that solar still has a very bright future,” he said. “We don’t really see any kind of sharp drop-off coming up on Saturday, or really over the next four years,” Price said. “And one of the reasons is this has been projected or telegraphed to developers since at least the passage of [the OBBBA], so a year ago is when a lot of these decisions were made to safe harbor, to meet the construction deadlines.” The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Donald Trump signed into law July 4, 2025, stipulated that wind and solar projects had to commence construction within a year of the law’s enactment to qualify for the IRA’s clean electricity production and investment tax credits, or be subjected to an end of 2027 “placed in service” deadline to be eligible. “If you miss the deadline coming up, it is highly unlikely or improbable that you will be able to get a project in the door and placed in service before December 31 [2027], unless you are just so far along from all the work you’ve done in years past that you are basically at the finish line in terms of interconnection, and that your equipment is in a warehouse just waiting to be delivered,” Khan said. “I think that is very much an outlier, I think that’s more of the exception than the norm.” Looking ahead Chris Girouard, renewable energy tax credit attorney at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, said in an email that after July 4, he expects “energy industry participants to focus on their safe harbored projects through the end of the decade and lobby for changes in law that reintroduce tax credits applicable to wind and solar projects.” “To the extent tax credits become available for wind and solar projects that began construction after July 4, 2026, we expect the development of those projects to quickly pick back up,” Girouard said. “Outside of the wind and solar context, we expect that the increased attention in other energy technologies will continue to grow. Specifically, we are already seeing increased interest in battery and nuclear projects.” Bryen Alperin, managing director at Foss & Co, also said he anticipates solar and wind credits possibly being “extended sometime in the next few years.” “There are plenty of safe harbored projects,” Alperin said in an email. “As we get to 2029 to 2030, we may have a shortage of solar and wind projects, but by then we expect to have ramped up volume in other technologies.” Energy storage tax credits were left unscathed by the OBBBA’s cuts to the Inflation Reduction Act, offering batteries a boost, said Price and Khan. “One thing that I feel confident in, is it’ll be a lot of storage,” Price said. “We’ve already seen a lot of storage deployment … Q1 was a record quarter.” Khan said he thinks that industry thinking could even shift from solar-plus-storage to storage-plus-solar to power data centers, “to be able to provide a firm shape to the power output of the facility, so that it can actually match the utility’s load profile or the data center’s load profile much better.” Another challenge posed by the OBBBA was its new foreign entity of concern rules, which have complex provisions and have received limited additional guidance from the U.S. Department of the Treasury so far. Khan said that although FEOC enforcement began at the start of this year, “the rules are still not clear, and everyone’s obviously talking to law firms to try to get a better sense of the lay of the land, and we are dealing with an environment where it almost seems manufactured for confusion.” Girouard said he found the guidance released in February , which offered interim safe harbor guidance for calculating a project or component’s material assistance cost ratio, was “helpful to address market concerns.” “However, the lack of guidance regarding the effective control rules continues to be challenging for the renewable energy industry,” he said. “We, along with almost all of the industry, are hoping that forthcoming guidance from the IRS on those rules is released soon and that the guidance provides a practical approach to complying with the effective control regime.” Raafe Khan < Back Back

Careers at Camelot We currently do not have any open positions available. Please check back later for future opportunities. You may send your resume to hello@camelotenergygroup.com to be considered for future openings.

Mar 10, 2025 Constructability Part 1 Constructability refers to the overall ease and efficiency with which a project can be built. This directly influences both the speed of construction, and the cost required to complete the project. It encompasses various aspects of design, planning, procurement, and execution to ensure the project can be built effectively, safely, and within budget and timeline constraints. The Importance of Constructability in Solar and Battery Storage Projects When it comes to solar and battery storage projects, constructability should be considered as early as the site acquisition stage. Typically, during this phase, developers identify a potential land parcel and create a preliminary layout to assess site capacity, estimate annual energy production, and gauge interconnection feasibility using the limited information available. While this is a crucial first step, constructability concerns are often overlooked or insufficiently analyzed. This can lead to projects with critical constructability challenges advancing through the development process—resulting in wasted time and money on projects with a low likelihood of successful execution. The Camelot Energy team has extensive experience in development, engineering, procurement, and construction, allowing us to help owners and developers identify and address constructability concerns early in a project’s lifecycle. By doing so, we help mitigate late-stage issues, ensuring smoother project execution. This article is the first in a series on "Constructability," where the Camelot team will highlight common challenges and showcase solutions that enable seamless project development and construction. The Ups and Downs of Topography in Renewable Energy Projects One of the most common constructability issues we encounter during the development and construction phases is inadequate attention to topography . The terrain of a project site significantly impacts design feasibility, energy production estimates, and overall constructability. Why Topography Matters Most preliminary project layouts are created using publicly available data, which typically provides only 5’ or 10’ contour intervals. While this offers a rough idea of site conditions, it lacks the precision needed to fully de-risk a project. This limitation is particularly problematic for sites with complex terrain, dense forestation, or proximity to floodplains. For such projects, hiring a professional survey company to conduct a detailed topographic survey (with 2’ contour intervals or finer) is essential. This data enables developers and engineers to validate site conditions accurately and plan accordingly. Using Topography Data in Project Design and Development Once a detailed topographic survey is completed, the preliminary layout—including solar arrays, battery storage units, access roads, fencing, and equipment pads—should be incorporated into computer-aided design (CAD) software . By integrating this data into the design, engineers can assess site suitability and proactively address constructability challenges. At this stage, a slope analysis should be conducted to identify areas of concern. This analysis requires input from multiple disciplines, including civil, structural, and electrical engineers, construction professionals, and racking vendors . Collaboration ensures that all aspects of the project are evaluated, and risks are mitigated early. Key Topography Considerations for Constructability Civil Design Grading requirements to meet design standards Stormwater management and hydrology considerations Access road construction feasibility Equipment pad locations and elevation planning Structural Design Vendor-specific racking slope tolerances Structural calculations for stability and safety Accommodation of varying site elevations Electrical Design Trenching and underground conductor runs Placement of medium-voltage poles and guy wires for overhead lines Routing and protection of underground cables Construction Considerations Water management strategies during construction Temporary erosion control measures Site layout for construction staging areas Placement of office trailers and parking zones Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Planning Long-term vegetation management strategies Ongoing erosion control measures Why Early Topographic Analysis is Essential Topography sets the foundation for every aspect of a renewable energy project—it is the building block of successful development and project design. Identifying and addressing topographic challenges early minimizes risks, helps maintain budget and schedule discipline, and ensures that project goals are met. By taking a proactive approach, developers can avoid costly redesigns, permitting delays, and unexpected construction obstacles. Looking Ahead This article is just the beginning of our series on constructability. In upcoming articles, we will dive deeper into other critical factors affecting constructability, including geotechnical challenges, interconnection hurdles, and procurement risks. Stay tuned for more constructability insights from the Camelot Energy Group! < Back Back

< Back Nimisha Shah Associate Analyst Nimisha Shah is an Associate Analyst at Camelot Energy Group, where she focuses on researching energy markets, analyzing industry trends, and building analytical models that help support strategic and clean energy decisions. Her work involves translating complex financial, operational, and market data into clear insights that guide market positioning, business strategy, and decision-making within the evolving energy sector. She is particularly interested in how data and analytics can drive more informed and sustainable energy solutions in a rapidly changing industry. She recently earned her Master’s in Business Analytics from University of Massachusetts Amherst and holds a Bachelor’s degree in Financial Management from United States International University Africa. Her background in analytics and finance allows her to approach energy markets with both a strategic and data-driven perspective. Outside of work, she enjoys spending time in nature, exploring new food spots, and experiencing different cultures through travel and cuisine. Growing up in Nairobi gave her a strong appreciation for staying connected to nature and finding balance outside of work. nimisha.shah@camelotenergygroup.com

< Back Michelle Aguirre, NABCEP PVIP Project Manager Michelle Aguirre is a Project Manager with over 6 years of experience in managing engineering projects. Michelle has expertise in electrical safety, quality assurance, technical report writing, and project management. Michelle has supported with Technical Advisory, Owner’s Engineering, and Supply Chain services on commercial to utility-scale PV and BESS projects with construction monitoring, technology reviews, and managing the quality assurance and traceability of major equipment. Prior to joining Camelot, Michelle was a Product Safety Engineer at TUV SUD. Michelle has the NABCEP PV Installation Professional certification, is a registered Engineer-in-Training in the state of California, and holds a B.S. in Environmental Engineering from the University of California-San Diego. michelle.aguirre@camelotenergygroup.com

< Back Bill Coon, NABCEP PVIP Head of Construction Bill is Camelot’s Head of Construction and oversees all aspects of solar and storage construction and installation quality. This work includes construction monitoring, field supervision, and QA inspection of clean energy construction projects. Bill has over 20 years in the construction field and prior to joining Camelot oversaw QA and safety for a solar construction company and spent time as a construction project manager, solar inspector, and engineer. Bill has a Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Syracuse University. Bill also holds Installer, Inspector, Commissioning, and Maintenance certifications from the North American Board of Certified Energy Professionals (NABCEP) and is a licensed electrician. bill.coon@camelotenergygroup.com

Oct 30, 2025 NFPA 855 (2026) Taylor Swift dropped her new album, but the NFPA dropped the 2026 edition of 855: Camelot is reviewing the standards and there will be a dedicated post about this in the coming weeks – stay tuned! Please reach out to us if you require guidance on the ensuring your systems are code compliant and you have the best resources to complete fire safety engineering General Scoping: The latest edition has reorganized things which reduce ambiguity and cross references that existed across chapters in prior editions General requirements have been moved into a single chapter; technology specific chapters with tailored rules which should create fewer conflicts and clearer applications during code reviews Large-Scale Fire Testing (LSFT): The latest edition puts a stronger emphasis on LSFT but creates an anchor to UL 9540A. The most significant single change is the introduction of full-scale burn testing with flammable gas ignition. In the short-term, this puts the 2026 NFPA 855 ahead of UL 9540A, as the 4 th edition does not provide a procedure for this gas ignition process. This is expected to be addressed in the upcoming 5 th edition of UL9540A, to be released in March, but in the meantime, specifics of new LSFT procedures are a bit of a gap in the new edition of NFPA 855. Conceptually, the new LSFT is considered an alternative unit-level test, adding to the typical number of UL 9540A tests that need to be reviewed as part of typical due diligence. Engineers, like Camelot, will now need to review cell, module, unit, and LSFT test reports to validate system design and code compliance but, overall, this added testing is expected to result in improved safety. Source: UL For larger, denser designs, the 2026 edition elevates LSFT to an expected component to demonstrate containment, adjacent to unit impacts and realistic configurations (multiple racks, aisle spacing, ceiling effects, heat flux, etc.) Source: Hithium It is important for engineers to budget for real estate when proposing dense BESS layouts with tight clustering. Camelot expects AHJs will ask for both UL 9540A and system-scale LSFT evidence in permitting packages Explosion control: While previous editions allowed owners to comply via either passive (e.g., deflagration panels) or active (e.g., gas detection and ventilation), the 2026 edition will now require manufacturers to use active ventilation measures complying with NFPA 69. Manufacturers may still use passive measures if desired but these, alone, will no longer be compliant with NFPA 855. The new standard also increases the requirements for documentation around explosion control and the rigor of hazard mitigation analyses (HMA). The new edition also provides more specific requirements for supplying backup power to explosion control systems, allowing them to remain operational when grid power is disconnected. Enhanced documentation requirements: The 2026 cycle clarifies HMA expectations (inputs, scenarios, outcomes) and pushes better correlation between detection technologies and mitigation strategies (e.g., clean agent vs water, deflagration prevention vs passive venting). This is a direct response to inconsistent submittals in prior cycles. Camelot expects AHJ to scrutinize HMAs and modeling assumptions, so it is important to be explicit about gas evolution triggers, alarm setpoints, failure modes, fan curves, agent hold times, ventilation rates, fail-safe logic, etc. Owners will need to be ready to work closely with suppliers to provide AHJs with more test data, modeling results, and similar technical information going forward. NFPA 855 also draws a distinction between Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) and Emergency Operations Plans (EOP). Much of this content was previously merged into a single document but going forward, ERPs will focus on firefighter and emergency personnel information, whilst the EOP will provide key information for the owner/operator. The result should be two more targeted and accessible documents replacing a single broad document, but developers will need to plan on refreshing previous templates and some additional time to coordinate separately on these key documents. Technology coverage has been expanded in the 2026 edition which intends to reduce overapplication of Li-specific requirements to chemistries with different risk profiles, like lead-acid, aqueous Nickel, etc. Operations and Maintenance: Since testing expectations have been made explicit, field-based modifications like augmentation may potentially invalidate test representativeness. It is expected that the AHJs will trigger re-evaluations to ensure everything is up to code The latest edition also states that the project owners schedule annual ERP reviews and training for first responders to maintain compliance. This has been the best practice for some time but jurisdictions adopting NFPA 855 will now have grounds to make this a requirement. It is also worth putting this new edition of NFPA 855 into a broader context, as things are moving fast on the ESS codes and standards front. Camelot is closely tracking several related codes and standards efforts, including: NFPA 800 (Battery Safety Code) is a new standard with far more breadth than previous codes, covering all aspects of battery safety from manufacturing and storage to operations and disposal. It goes beyond stationary ESS, as well. The code is still in its first draft, but the Technical Committee is actively working on updates. UL 9540A 5 th Edition: As noted above, the new edition of this critical testing standard will likely provide updated guidance to better address the LSFT requirements put forth in NFPA 855 (2026) and this should be released in March. Camelot’s CEO, Shawn Shaw, is working on an update to the 2022 Energy Storage Systems and the IBC, IFC, IRC, and NEC published by the International Code Council. Stay tuned for more updates and a final publication date soon. Raafe Khan, Shawn Shaw < Back Back